also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi <c...@debian.org> [2015-03-03 12:51 +0100]: > I also find that sometime I'm trying to write an answer and > topic/agree were moved before I can press RETURN. On old meeting > there were a lot of silence periods, which was also not ideal.
Maybe we can just vote? Maybe there's a way to automatically count votes and then we can either move on based on majority, or reschedule the discussion. > IMHO we should also avoid to move too much discussion away from > meetings: there is more risk to have no decision, but with too > long discussions (which will be repeated on many different > channels). Well, it's hard to suppress discussion like this. If I may offer a counter-proposal, then the responsible person of an agenda item should update the wiki table well ahead of time and be prepared to give an exec summary (pre-written, just paste) at the start of his/her topic, describing the challenge, the status quo, major opinions and sketching a way forward. More work for the drivers, but less work for everyone in total… and faster decisions. Well, at least this is what happens elsewhere. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
