also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <e...@zhevny.com> [2015-02-24 19:29 +0100]: > As for having it on -team ... you have said many times in various > ways that we need to trust teams to do their work and make their > decisions, which I think I mostly agree with. I don't know if it's > the right way or best way to get to that goal, but it seems likely > to me that a separate public list could be a mechanism to mentally > and logistically provide that autonomy while also providing > transparency.
Yes, that echoes my concern very well, thanks! Basically, a separate list would give the team a sort of autonomous space where guests are welcome, but they are just that: guests. Yes, this should also be possible on dc-team, but as you equally well said: > It might require something of a cultural shift and change of > thinking for many of us (myself definitely included) to provide > a sub team with input, advice and opinions w/o trying to control > or micro-manage that sub team's decisions. But how about we try it? Use dc-team for the discussion and keep that in mind, content team — if you feel like you are being held back by too much input or unclear competencies, then making a new list will be a matter of 48 hours… -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org DebConf16: Cape Town: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebConf16
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
