On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Margarita Manterola <margamanter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For DebConf15 we would like to try something new regarding DebCamp. > Instead of asking each person to come up with a "DebCamp plan", we'd > like to make a "Call for Sprints" together with the "Call for Talks", > encouraging people to think on things that they would like to work on > that will benefit from more people working together on the same thing. > Then, later on, publish the list of sprints and let people sign up for > them. What metric would be used to determine which sprints are "accepted"? Or is that simply left to the content team to deal with? I am not objecting, mind. I just want to make sure that we are all agreed on the underlying assumptions. > The sprints don't need to last the whole DebCamp, we could have > sprints that ar 1 or 2 days long. They also are not exclusive to > DebConf, if there's a team that knows they'd benefit more from having > sprints during DebConf, we could also make that happen. Just to make sure, the first "DebConf" should actually read "DebCamp"? Else, I like it. Richard _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
