On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 08:41:54PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Kees Cook <k...@debian.org> wrote: > >> All devices were flashed with OpenWRT. This is quite practical for two > >> reasons (beside the fact that its Free Software ;-)): > >> - It's easier to deploy identical configuraitons as you can copy around > >> configuration files and don't have to click through a web interface. > >> - You can configure different VLANs and trunk ports on the built in > >> Switch of the APs. Most consumer grade APs are not VLAN capable.
> > Yeah, my plan was for OpenWRT too. However, we'll defer to what's possible > > with our equipment. :) > While it's not strictly needed, renting equipment that supports an > Access Controller can reduce management effort a _lot_, especially in > case of unexpected breakage in an area, etc. > If the bugdet allows for this, it should probably be considered. There is nothing in the DC14 budget for equipment rental. The budget, which was based on the published DC13 budget, allowed for a small expenditure related to equipment shipping, but no one saw fit to mention that rental of network equipment might be a requirement. > DC13 rented equipment from a company that's near to CCC so we got a discount. Really? If this is the case, why does no information about this appear in git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/debconf-data/dc13.git accounting/budget.ods ? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
