also sprach Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> [2014-05-02 19:44 +0200]: > I don't really have a strong opinion on whether this should be > part of a CoC. If we accept that the dual purpose of the CoC is > to make people feel welcome who would otherwise fear being > subjected to abuse and to remind people to be on their best > behavior, does a "no swears" policy contribute to this goal? I'm > not sure that it does, but I'm also not sure it's problematic to > include.
cf. broken windows theory. > BTW, regarding said "dual purpose" - perhaps it would be a good > idea to call this out explicitly in the CoC as a "rationale" > statement, which both frames it for the reader and provides > guidance to the team in the future when they need to bugfix it. Yes, that is a good idea. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@debconf.org> : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf14: Portland, OR, USA: http://debconf14.debconf.org DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
