On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Lucas Nussbaum <lea...@debian.org> wrote:
> So I'm not against considering the idea of keep the DC15 TO after DC15, > but this will clearly have to be weighted against the disadvantages of > this option. We decided to go with a single-use eV for DebConf15, because: * of the valid points aba raised wrt taxes * of the discussion about the name and concerns from various parties * we value moving quickly and without (too much) resistance over a mere name Please note that the by-laws may not reflect this directly for legal reasons. Richard _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
