Patty Langasek <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 01:55:59PM +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote: >> begin quotation from Arne Wichmann (in >> <[email protected]>): >> > Appended is a censored proposal for a conference bag. Is this design >> > acceptable, and if not, what would be needed to change? > >> So, after some discussions I have 2 other designs which should make the >> distinction between gold/platinum sponsors and bag sponsor clearer. As >> timing is an issue now (printing takes a month) I urge you to answer >> quickly (until Tuesday) if you do not like this proposal. > > I think the proposal looks good, though I will say that the 'bag sponsored > by' looks a little ... akward. I understand the sentiment behind it, but it > just seems weird. Could we keep that design, but simply omit the words and > have people still be happy? The gold/platinum sponsor logos are still > prominent, and the bag sponsor logo is separated, but still present and > obvious. > > Anyone else?
The "sponsored by" addition was done specifically because of a comment after the last proposal was sent to the list. So changing this again would mean a step backwards. I'm personally not 100% convinced that it's necessary, but I'd rather produce the bags as they are now than doing yet another design round. What we have now is kind of a compromise proposal. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
