>> * Food: :food_id "Am staying off-site and will provide own food" Is there a validation rule, which checks that this option can only be selected, if attendee is not staying at LeCamp?
>> * I am not really sure that the questions set makes it clear enough what room >> category would the "sponsored accomodation" attendees get, but don't have a >> good proposal on how to solve it. Also, it's not really clear that "nights" >> include breakfast at the venue. > > This will be explained in the announcment mail. The idea is that > sponsored participants can only choose this at a later stage when we've > gather enough information for them "I accept communal" question. I think we need to explain what it means to chose no here, otherwise everyone will chose "no". e.g. we replace it with a selection: communal_accomodation: * I'd accept sponsored communal accomodation * I'd pay to get non-communal accomodation * I'd not come to DebConf, if only sponsored communal accomodation is provided > I'm fine with lowering the price of camping a bit. Or are you thinking > about also lowering the price of the communal beds? But for camping I > think we should be explicit that there is limited availability. And that > we don't promise anything yet. I also think this will only affect a very > small number of persons as most of those sleeping in these "beds" will be > sponsored. The fee is actually CHF10/day (+CHF10 for breakfast). If we lower this even more (e.g. make it free), I'd like to lower it also for the communal beds. They cost the same for us and I don't think we want people to camp just because of the price. Removal of paid upgrade from the accomodation options: I'm ok with removing it, if we replace it with a question about willingness to pay (like above) Philipp _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
