On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Damyan Ivanov <d...@debian.org> wrote:
> -=| Moray Allan, Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:09:09PM +0100 |=- > > 2011/6/9 Damyan Ivanov <d...@debian.org>: > > > Would it be better if we aim at total pixels used > > > > Yes. (I'd suggest just approximating it by width ⨉ height.) > > This is now online and it sort of looks alright, but is not exactly as > planned. > > Here are the size guidelines: > > Level Width Height Total pixels > -------- ----- ------ ------------ > Platinum 220 100 22 000 > Gold 200 60 12 000 > Silver 180 50 9 000 > Bronze 140 45 6 300 > Steel 100 40 4 000 > > The problem is that there is a CSS-imposed maximum width of 150 pixels > and some wide logos are scaled down as a result. The most obvious case > is the canonical logo, the optimal size of wich is 260×34 (8840px² > with norm of 9000) and it is scaled to 150×20 (3000px²). If I remove > the width limit (locally, with firebug), the sponsor list becomes far > too wide. Should we care about this scaling down? > > I am also wondering if the circle-like logos need a size bump? You > know, the area occupied by a 100×100 square is larger than by a circle > with diameter of 100. > > Maybe I am bikeshedding too much :) > > This is always going to be an issue. I think it's a good thing to have guidelines, but ultimately we have to go for what looks best on the website. Sometimes we have to bend the rules a bit in order to make a logo fit nicely, e.g. the Canonical logo or the circular logos. My two cents. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJN8duTAAoJEOQbTFV/DYC+vloP/33sm9q2yTiDxZuI6rSDvpvZ > Sf6aDYLiajrq2+UKMe9uet+SHkuPBZBhcvyAioiXvV+Fn+RFQ+tVly8CN15AoFMy > MRqeNThHr8NwFkDAXFwMhJq7awNSlXLwGjpPUyOpzI/plfq9nHilM5LDPtVcVhDf > T8oWUlByEaixjk0/uNoTrvRiH0rz86IpZlcOitAtnSnPWVub4UWkmXMezCmnz4tK > hMWx0DvuftBjN43QLh6QT6/eFJDVcvkesTO6/E9zHQ2BZeura3/z+9HUZmMNYjER > hpfEv8Kr2zhq+X/8B+Y9DVS8j4PasBi5Mu/5vCelPyiHViEoh05aaqBM0kg0iGO9 > DRElNFxTUjEtuDPTX60A2uX5CN3Froof/aob6GCGsQ68kpTpHBEPT+fdyJPRuY+G > hG8w4iCRIMR0tVgj9ZNPcqyEkO2AUJMWPpY8yChFjw21xWCe7b9uc3BhzMXkevAp > cf5XZFHuVG3wEtJbSLl01jewMZp1U13kEiVCBMZWyJfxwQSMID4ebIJ38Kfrq+In > utZgfzZvkNFOo1bexyHY03GJbxv8qza6rwT/NIs99EeUwvgioTmpLeBCjfnQcqOj > W21ED1THa+dy9eD02UFjjOX9ymLUoMvdp3oD5Ox8fdvUUb5UgOXI/iVIiiwaJl44 > sf20dzWYj07tsDBYZSXd > =10Ts > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Debconf-team mailing list > Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org > http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team > >
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
