On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:29:24AM -0400, micah anderson wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:06:51 -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <e...@zhevny.com> > wrote: > > > > My traceroute [v0.73] > > > > umbra (0.0.0.0) > > Thu Jul 15 15:50:28 2010 > > Host Loss% Snt > > Last Avg Best Wrst StDev > > 1. mudd-edge-1-vlan86-1.net.columbia.edu 0.3% 7117 > > 0.4 8.2 0.3 245.4 29.3 > > 2. dhcp-13-248.cs.columbia.edu 0.3% 7116 > > 0.4 0.7 0.3 269.0 9.8 > > > > umbra == edrz's laptop > > 248 == barney > > > ... > > Also tested bulk transfers from Interschool. Basically, it doesn't look > > like that network will be a bottleneck. We consistently had 100+mbs > > avg. with peaks to 500mbs. probably with more hosts to send to/receive > > from we could have used up more bandwidth. > > Did you try iperf tests, or just mtr?
I had mtr running while testing with dvswitch and with file transfers. I did not try iperf, sorry. -edrz _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team