On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 01:02:54AM -0400, Richard Darst wrote:
> Jimmy and I talked and decided that decided there's no reason that the
> talks shouldn't be scheduled through Penta via the usual mechanisms.
> So unless someone proposes a better way, we'll go with that for now.
I'm also in favour of Penta.
> Then, we need to all work on getting them the talks to select and
> schedule from.
Especially we need registered talks marked "DebianDay". Currently
there is not that much to select from ...
> - If a talk is registered in penta, they already have it and can
> select.
>
> - If it's not in penta but you have some details or an idea, send it
> to them[0]. The you should work on getting it submitted to penta.
>
> [0] gw...@debian.org , ti...@dedian.org , (sorry, don't know tassia's)
I'm sorry - I'm against sending suggestions in private mail.
Please enforce people to use penta. I'm not in the mood to
proxy filling in a penta form if there is no strong reason
why the submitter can not do it himself.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
