On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jimmy Kaplowitz <ji...@debian.org> wrote: > I am hesitant to propose any detailed process for how we should decide, since > I > am one of the people leading the NYC bid and I don't want to have the process > appear or actually be biased. I'll just say that, if there is going to be only > one decision meeting, late February would be a good time, and if there are > multiple meetings, spreading them out through February (and late January if > necessary) would make sense. This will allow all bids to gather additional > bits > of data, such as the price specifics the NYC bid is currently gathering and > the > MIT faculty sponsor the Boston bid is working on.
This timeline sounds okay to me. We already have faculty sponsors at MIT, but we're just waiting to get some cost & logistics estimates from conference services (everyone has been on winter break). It's probably a good thing that the 3(?) bids are all in similar time zones, as scheduling meetings should be simple. _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
