* Holger Levsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060705 12:08]: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 04 July 2006 09:07, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Monday 03 July 2006 18:57, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > > > it turns out that only one of the options would not require us to > > > come up with an alternative way of funding debconf (one of the > > > ones in sarajevo, which involves the arabic culture center). > > EPARSE :) do you say, the only venue which doesn't require new ways of > > funding is sarajevo ? :) > > From reading the whole backlog now I guess thats what you think: only the > dorm > + center option doesnt requiere new ways of funding (or spending money). > > However, I would have appreciated an answer instead of being forced to guess > :(
i was under the impression that that was more like a rethoric questioĊ, since i explicitly mention this in my reports. > > What are the numbers (aka costs) exactly? How much money to we get for the > > established way :) of funding debconf? > > > > Are the new calculation already in svn? > > So no answer means "no" here I guess? I find it very hard to follow arguments > "backed up by numbers" without being able to see those numbers. A spreadsheet > would be more than nice to have. they are. but i guess they are not clear enough. I did not start a speadsheet because the whole situation seems rather trivial so far and we are just doing estimates. > Because, Andreas, in your report from Sarajevo you calculate with 300 people, > while in the Edinburgh report you calculate with 350 people. Maybe I got your > calculations wrong, but thats also why I suggest a spreadsheet so everybody > interested can play with the numbers herself. i most likely pulled in the people from debcamp into debconf. 300 for debconf + 50 (on average) during debcamp for one week each is the same as 300+50=350 for one week. did i skip debcamp costs for sarajevo? _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
