On Friday, July 18, 2025 4:49:24 p.m. Central European Summer Time Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote: > Le 2025-07-18 08:29, Alex Lieflander a écrit : > > I would like to remind here (and this is not make it whataboutist > fallacy) that statistically it is almost certain that several persons > infected with COVID are currently walking around in the venue and > spreading the disease: > - people that are infected and won't have any symptom (according to > doctors, with the current variants this happens fairly often) > - people that are infected and don't yet have symptoms > - people that have symptoms and ignore them, because they are very mild > and look just like a common cold (as with my own case) or something else > (as with the local strain that is heavier on GI symptoms) > - people that unquestionably have some COVID symptoms and choose to > ignore them, because they want to avoid the consequences (from > additional distancing to self-isolation) > > There is nothing that can be done about this, short of testing every > person every single day, and even then some cases would still escape the > screening (the rate of false negatives with these antigenic self-tests > is low but still significant). > > If you think that having masked and careful COVID-infected persons > around makes a significant difference in terms of risks, I suspect that > you actually severely underestimate your current exposure to > contamination with the rest of the crowd around.
Here's an example calculation of the risk with some **rough** approximations. Let's assume that: - There are 400 Debconf attendees - 5% of Debconf attendees currently have COVID - 20% of people with COVID are either asymptomatic or ignore their symptoms - COVID tests give a false negative 10% of the time - 100% of people who know they have COVID wear a mask at all times - 0% of unknowingly COVID-positive people wear masks - The probability of a particular person being infected by an unmasked person with COVID is 5% - The probability of a particular person being infected by a COVID positive person wearing a mask is 1% Of the 400 attendees, 20 would have COVID and 16 of those people would have symptoms and get tested. 2 people would get a false negative, so there would be 6 unknowingly COVID-positive people (4 asymptomatic + 2 false negatives) and 14 people who know they have COVID. Since the probability of a positive unmasked person infecting a particular person is 5%, the probability of an unmasked person NOT infecting that person is 95%. The probability that NEITHER the first person, NOR the second person, NOR the third, NOR the fourth (etc) infect that person is 0.95^6=0.74 or 74%. If the knowingly positive people self-isolate, their chance of infecting people is basically 0%. If they continue to attend the conference while wearing masks, the probability that none of them infect a particular person is 0.99^14=0.87 or 87%. The probability that neither group infects a particular person is 0.74*0.87=0.64 or 64%. That means that if everyone who knows they have COVID self-isolates, each healthy attendee would have a 26% probability of being infected. If everyone who knows they have COVID continues to attend the conference, each healthy attendee has a 46% probability of being infected. TL;DR: Even assuming some asymptomatic people and some false negative tests, if people who know they have COVID just wear a mask instead of self-isolating, each healthy attendee would be 76% more likely **relative to the other option** to be infected. I'm not a doctor or an epidemiologist, but I do know a bit about statistics. Alex
