Jose-Luis Rivas <ghost...@debian.org> 于2024年7月29日周一 21:54写道： > > On Sat Jul 27, 2024 at 1:05 PM -03, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 11:40:26AM -0300, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: > > > Maybe Sequoia could make a good landing page about these differences? I > > > am not that bad about googling and I couldn't figure it out by myself > > > when you mentioned it before :) > > > > there's https://wiki.debian.org/OpenPGP/Sequoia but it's not yet what I > > would > > like it to be. > > > > plus there's obviously also upstream documentation from the Sequoia project, > > but that's not my department. ;) > > I took the liberty to add a section on the differences of implementation > between Sequoia and GnuPG v2.3.0+. > > If it is incorrect to do in that page, or the content looks > biased/problematic, please feel free to make the necessary corrections. > > https://wiki.debian.org/OpenPGP/Sequoia#Differences_in_implementation_with_GnuPG_v2.3.0_or_later >
So, do we have any conclusion during this workshop? I am looking for to use GNUPG2.4+ for TPM2 support. Is it possbile for us to patch GNUPG2.4+ to override its default behaivor to generate pre-V5 certificate by defualt? > - Jose > -- YunQiang Su
