Hi Ian, On 06/11/14 18:04, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Wouldn't it make sense for this team to be responsible directly to the > rest of the project via the DPL, rather than have the whole thing at > arm's length via the Debconf chairs ? > > I only suggest this because it's not clear whether the people who > recently conducted the review of the Debconf organisational structu > felt that they had to take the positions and roles of the Debconf > chairs as a given. > > If the review team feel that the separation between the coordinators > and the chairs is valueable then I'm not seeking to undermine that. I am not entirely sure I understood what are you proposing here, but I guess you were proposing that the chairs became part of this team? We are going to be working closely with this team, but for now we prefer to stay at a distance, we will see how this plays out. Also, it was us (the chairs) leading the review of the orga structure. > If I can quibble, it might be worth calling this the `site selection It is a historic name, but it can surely be changed if the coordination teams decides so (as they are in charge of the committee). -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
