On 6 August 2011 19:41, martin f krafft <madd...@debconf.org> wrote: > As said before, this reverses responsibility. It is *your* > responsibility to ensure that whatever you do does not interfere > with the privacy, intimacy, and freedom of others. An argument like > "I've tried, but I have bad memory and thus …" is just a cop-out.
Legally there are only two real options: * either we view Debconf as an newsworthy even of public import (or whatever the exact definition is in your region) and in that case there is no expectation of privacy; * or, if we reject the above assertion, then EVERY photographer must get EVERY person in EACH photograph to PHYSICALLY SIGN a printed Model Release Form before any such image can be published in any shape or form. Same for video. If we go the second route, then I don't think there will be very many human-containing photos or videos from the next Debconf, if any at all. If we go the first route, then, while we are not we are not legally obliged to do so, but as a courtesy we will take down images and try to avoid taking them if people specifically request so, as it has always been done in the past. There is no middle road, unfortunately. As we all know, copyright law is quite .. nuclear in its approach to mosquito safety. -- Best regards, Aigars Mahinovs mailto:aigar...@debian.org #--------------------------------------------------------------# | .''`. Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org) | | : :' : Latvian Open Source Assoc. (http://www.laka.lv) | | `. `' Linux Administration and Free Software Consulting | | `- (http://www.aiteki.com) | #--------------------------------------------------------------# _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
