On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:02:22AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Why is Gobby prefered over Etherpad for the BOFs and talks at Debconf? > Personally I prefer Etherpat (I normally use <URL: http://titanpad.com/ >) > because it only require a functioning browser, and there is no need to > ask participants to install extra software. As far as I can see, the > feature set is compatible, and I fail to notice anything relevant > where Gobby is doing a lot better. The only slight improvement is the > directory browsing, but that to medo not seem to be enough reason to > require extra software to be installed to write text. > > Anyone care to explain why they prefer Gobby over Etherpad at Debconf?
Because as far as I see titanpad is a propriatory sw that runs on someones server. At the same time gobby is installed on debian servers so we do not rely on a 3rd party. Regards, cstamas -- CSILLAG Tamas (cstamas) - http://digitus.itk.ppke.hu/~cstamas _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
