On 25 May 2006, Holger Levsen stated: > Hi, > > while I agree that flaws in the actual protocol being used are > problematic and worth pointing out, I wonder much more why people > aren't more worried about how people use their computers: (double > booting windows and) not using encrypted partitions, leaving there > computers unlocked while being away, using binary only (non-free) > software, running experimental packages from various sources > (assuming that sid, testing and stable are safe..), etc. This > potentially exposes the integrity of the private key, not only the > integrity of signatures - which later can be revoked anyway.
I have given up on that. People insist on using their keys on networked computers, they even leave them lying around on _public_ machines over which they have little control. If I were to insist on proper key security protocols, there would be a small handlful of people who would qualify. > After a talk about the problems with gpg's web of trust at 22C3 > (e.g. in what do you put trust when you sign a key? the person being > the person or her/his ability to keep his private key private or his > ability to sign other peoples keys ? Lacking proper psychic abilities, I can't honestly give my word on the latter. > Having said this, I also do believe that any step to create a bit > more trust is a worthwhile one. We should just never forget, that > _we_ don't sign stuff with gpg, it's our computer who does the > signing. And this is completly different from "real" signatures. I have never signed anything in reality. It is either a computer, or a pen, doing the "signing". Do you have a point about people being poor at any form of signing if no tools are used? manoj -- I have been insulted! I have been hurt! I have been beaten! I have been robbed! Anger does not cease in those who harbour this sort of thought. 3 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss