This number already comes from solver_control, given as solver_control.last_step ();
Am Montag, 7. Oktober 2019 15:33:29 UTC+2 schrieb Wolfgang Bangerth: > > On 10/7/19 5:32 AM, 'Maxi Miller' via deal.II User Group wrote: > > I implemented the changes in step-36 suggested in the tutorial for using > > ARPACK instead of PETSc (as shown in the attachment). Now, the solver > reports > > a convergence in 4294967295 iterations (with correct result), thus I > assume a > > overflow/underflow bug. Is that something which I should report in the > github > > issues? > > 4294967295=-1 when expressed in unsigned int. This usually indicates some > kind > of error condition. It would be worth figuring out where this number is > generated because it's pretty clear that that is not the actual number of > iterations performed. > > Best > W. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Wolfgang Bangerth email: bang...@colostate.edu > <javascript:> > www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/ > > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/3ba1cfa0-7a23-482a-8a47-ae24668d2df1%40googlegroups.com.
