Hi all,

In step-36, there is an explanation on how Dirichlet boundary conditions 
introduce spurious eigenvalues because some dofs are constrained. However, 
there is no mention of hanging nodes. So I am wondering if I can treat them 
as shown for the Dirichlet boundary, i.e, the only difference between a 
hanging node and a Dirichlet is what happens in 
ConstraintMatrix::distribute(). I also wonder if there is a way to avoid 
having these spurious eigenvalues computed or if the only way to deal with 
them is to redo the calculation after changing the entries in the matrix.

Best,

Bruno

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to