On 11/17/2017 12:37 PM, Juan Carlos Araujo Cabarcas wrote:
I would like to reproduce step-27 but with curved boundaries with the
use of MappingCollection.
Everything seems to work fine, but I noticed that data_out does not seem
to be implemented for passing a MappingCollection.
Yes, that seems to be correct. There is even a @todo in the
documentation of the function that takes a mapping.
In particular I would like to be able to use something like:
data_out.build_patches (mapping_collection, 8,
DataOut<dim>::curved_inner_cells);
Any hints on how to achieve this are greatly appreciated!
I suspect that -- unless you are on a very coarse mesh -- the difference
between the different mappings are not really visible in a
visualization. Could you just pass the higher order mapping to the
function, instead of the entire mapping collection?
That's not the "correct" approach, of course, but it's likely not going
to lead to visible differences.
Best
W.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bange...@colostate.edu
www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
