On 07/05/2016 10:46 AM, Artur Safin wrote:

I am working on solving a Helmholtz-type problem, where I am using the
PML method to simulate absorbing boundary conditions. Originally (before
adding PML) I was using the complex GAMG preconditioner from the PETSc
package, which was working fine. But now I am having a difficulty where
the solver does not converge due to PML.

If anyone has any suggestions or experience, that would be greatly
appreciated.

Artur -- there are two options: either the matrix is not invertible, or the preconditioner is not a good preconditioner for the matrix. My first step in debugging such problems is usually to try a direct solver such as SparseDirectUMFPACK first, in order to make sure the matrix is really invertible and yields the correct solution. Once I'm sure of that, one can start thinking of the preconditioner.

Best
 W.


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth               email:            bange...@math.tamu.edu
                                www: http://www.math.tamu.edu/~bangerth/

--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to