Am 18.04.2018 um 07:32 schrieb Thomas Raschbacher: > hmm .. > > I have no such problems with dbmail 3.2.3 (and gmime 2.6.20
looking at all the urgent fixes after 3.0 as well as 3.1 where a ton of people pretended all is fine made me shy in case of dbmail updates especially when development seems to be dead %changelog * Wed Dec 7 2016 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> - add dbmail-prepend-headers-during-delivery.patch is at least this one part of 3.2 or did it too never made it to a stable tarball? and yes - add own headers at the bottom is a major issue when it comes to software like SpamAssin which needs to find the trust-path > On 2018-04-16 14:34, Reindl Harald wrote: >> moving from imap-sent folder to a local-folder don't break it see >> diff from the this way "saved" orginal sent and the broken one >> >> this is the source-tarball and one of the last important patches >> how dbmail is built here >> https://access.thelounge.net/harry/dbmail-sources.zip >> >> dbmail.spec from the rpmbuild also attached >> >> >> Am 16.04.2018 um 14:29 schrieb Reindl Harald: >>> sorry for the mail-flood - but i will try to move it now to a >>> local folder - i think the breakage to the sent message happens >>> instantly but thunderbird before moveing it shows some caching >>> where it is fine and not put through dbmail re-construct >>> >>> good question if this also happens when move it straight to a >>> local folder >>> >>> Am 16.04.2018 um 14:24 schrieb Reindl Harald: >>>> this message was broken too while the sent message was green >>>> until i moved it with drag&drop from sent to the dbmail >>>> folder with the intention to make a diff >>>> >>>> now for both copies enigmail says "wrong signature" >>>> >>>> Am 16.04.2018 um 14:09 schrieb Reindl Harald: >>>>> Am 16.04.2018 um 13:48 schrieb Thomas Raschbacher: >>>>>> do you have that problem vor every signed email, or just >>>>>> occasionally? cuz i haven't noticed problems on my part >>>>>> yet >>>>> >>>>> hard to say, but on enough that i stopped using Enigmail >>>>> long ago when neraly every list message i wrote came back >>>>> with broken signature in case i used GPG/Mime meaning >>>>> "signature.asc" attached instead inline signing >>>>> >>>>> for me at that time it wasn't clear that it's my own >>>>> mailserver running dbmail-1.3 and not the list servers >>>>> which are breaking something but the diff you can see is >>>>> the outbound mail of someone which used dbamil himself and >>>>> switched to dovecot directly copied from his dovecot-imap >>>>> compared to my broken received one >>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-04-01 13:14, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>>>> ping - see also attached as diff >>>>>>> >>>>>>> if someone is able to fix that for dbmail-3.1 i offer >>>>>>> to pay the work >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2874f497fb429ed139e94342ca1c84325b20b3f1 is the git >>>>>>> with latest fixes for 3.1 before move to github - not >>>>>>> sure if they ever made it to a offical release and we >>>>>>> applied the patch from paul (also attached) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> frankly i would sell my soul when dbmail get active >>>>>>> maintainment again because the silence of the last few >>>>>>> years holds me back to consider upgrade to 3.2 given >>>>>>> that upgrades to 3.0 and 3.1 in both cases needed a lot >>>>>>> of urgency patches after user complaints with several >>>>>>> clients mostly re-construct errors _______________ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Mi Dez 07 2016 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> >>>>>>> - add dbmail-prepend-headers-during-delivery.patch >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Mi Jan 20 2016 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> >>>>>>> - update to 2874f497fb429ed139e94342ca1c84325b20b3f1 >>>>>>> bugfix snapshot - prevent assertion in p_string_erase >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * So Jul 27 2014 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> >>>>>>> - update to 3.1.17 release >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 30.03.2018 um 16:23 schrieb Reindl Harald: >>>>>>>> dbmail-3.1.17-4.fc26.20171030.rh.2874f497fb429ed139e94342ca1c84325b20b3f1.x86_64 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> see screenshot - the linebreak in line 50 seems to change between \r\n >>>>>>>> and only \n which completly breaks the signature - >>>>>>>> inline signed mails don't break because they don't >>>>>>>> have a "signature.asc" attachment >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the plaintext version shows the same amount of >>>>>>>> linebreaks, but i have also seen dbmail-3.1 caces >>>>>>>> where some new lines are added or missing >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> pretty sure at reconstruct where i pointed out some >>>>>>>> year ago to Paul that sometimes linebreaks change and >>>>>>>> that could break signed mails while the response was >>>>>>>> they don't matter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://lists.nfg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail