Am 15.07.2016 um 14:03 schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 2016-07-15 13:00, Reindl Harald wrote:Am 15.07.2016 um 13:55 schrieb Gordan Bobic:Let me turn that adound - how long an acceptance of things being broken might be defined as reasonable?frankly - where should that discussion end? i just need to see the software which works like a wonder and don't make other problems - and be it only that you lose adminitsrative features which are possible over a encrypted sql connection and would neet to be replaced with cronjobs since exectue a system command in a web-application on a remote server isn't possible without degrade any sense of security if you try to explain me my job forget it - if your services (no matter which ones) have no watchdogs you would be better served when one explains you your job which as sysadmin means high availbility in case of the unexpexted happensExactly - when _UNEXPECTED_ happens. It isn't unexpected if it happens on an hourly basis. HA is something to rely on in case of a disaster. What you seem to be advocating sounds more like accepting disaster as the permanent ongoing stateboah it does not on a hourly basis - the last crash was months ago here troll somewhere elseYou are obviously doing better than me. I was getting dbmail-imap crashes at least once/day on my personal mail server, with a total of 4 users on it
currently 250 mail domains running dbmail from 2009 until today
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
