Hi,

Thanks, yes I'm checking out the various software I use.

The issue might be that updated status rows are locked, for an example
when 2 messages are stores @ the same time on 2 different sql servers
and need to update another reference row as well.

I see this on logging software happening too for an example.



2016-02-13 19:11 GMT+01:00 Andrea Brancatelli <abrancate...@schema31.it>:
> InnoDB/MySQL locking is row level, not table level.
>
> It's highly improbable you'll have any problem like that.
>
> ---
>
> Andrea Brancatelli
> Schema31 S.p.a.
> Responsabile IT
>
> ROMA - BO - FI - PA
> ITALY
> Tel: +39. 06.98.358.472
> Cell: +39 331.2488468
> Fax: +39. 055.71.880.466
> Società del Gruppo SC31 ITALIA
>
>
>
> Il 2016-02-13 17:26 Matt . ha scritto:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm reviewing how software is acting on loadbalaced MySQL cluster in a
> MultiMaster replication.
>
> I see some software having issues to a frontend that is balanced on
> weight so if you put a lot of data to the frontend of the cluster, all
> nodes are written and if the software locks the table when it writes
> to it and the software connects again but the loadbalancer says, ok,
> use another server now because the other one is "too busy" you might
> run into trouble.
>
> My question is in this case, does DBmail lock the tables when it
> writes to it ? otherwise I can sismple change weigth to prio,
> otherwise I will let this be as I don't have these issues (yet) with
> DBmail.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> DBmail mailing list
> DBmail@dbmail.org
> http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Reply via email to