it's statically here - did you

a) restart all services
b) made sure using the correct dbmail.conf

3.1.17 here too over months
it belongs in the [DBMAIL] main-section

Am 22.12.2014 um 19:22 schrieb Jorge Bastos:
Reidnl,

With:

header_cache_readonly = yes

I keep having new headername's being inserted in dbmail_headername.

Maybe a bug?

I'm on 3.1.17

-----Original Message-----
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
Sent: domingo, 21 de Dezembro de 2014 22:05
To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail_headervalue

Reindl,

Thanks, i just wanna to have a more consistant ideia of the headers to
use.

-----Original Message-----
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Reindl Harald
Sent: sábado, 20 de Dezembro de 2014 12:36
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail_headervalue


Am 20.12.2014 um 10:33 schrieb Jorge Bastos:
Oh hum :)

Do you have:

Date
Subject
From
To
Sent

uhm i posted what i have and it's in every quote of that thread

  > > >> MariaDB [dbmail]> select * from dbmail_headername;  > > >>
+---
-----+-------------------+
  > > >> | id     | headername        |
  > > >> +--------+-------------------+
  > > >> |    183 | cc                |
  > > >> |      8 | content-type      |
  > > >> |      1 | date              |
  > > >> |      2 | from              |
  > > >> |     62 | importance        |
  > > >> |     44 | in-reply-to       |
  > > >> |      3 | message-id        |
  > > >> |      9 | mime-version      |
  > > >> | 111813 | newsgroups        |
  > > >> |    380 | priority          |
  > > >> |     47 | references        |
  > > >> |     38 | reply-to          |
  > > >> |     68 | status            |
  > > >> |      6 | subject           |
  > > >> |     69 | thread-index      |
  > > >> |    179 | thread-topic      |
  > > >> |      7 | to                |
  > > >> | 109464 | x-msmail-priority |
  > > >> | 111823 | x-msoesrec        |
  > > >> | 109408 | x-priority        |
  > > >> | 111825 | x-ref             |
  > > >> +--------+-------------------+  > > >> 21 rows in set (0.00
sec)

Question is, the ones that end up with null in the sort column i
think
are garbage also, am i right? :)

the only relevant question is if mail cliets are using a header for
sorting, display, threading and so on in the list view

"Reindl Harald (mobile)" <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
Just read what you quoted - the sql result is part of it. :-)


-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Jorge Bastos <mysql.jo...@decimal.pt>
Gesendet: 20. Dezember 2014 00:22:13 MEZ
An: 'DBMail mailinglist' <dbmail@dbmail.org>
Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail_headervalue

Reindl,

Tell me, i'm curious to know which headername do you have, can you
share?

I'm curious.

  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org
[mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org]
On  > Behalf Of Jorge Bastos  > Sent: domingo, 14 de Dezembro de
2014
18:23  > To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
  > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail_headervalue  >  > Hum,  >  > Fact
is
I
have garbage in headername table also, i have things that ARE  >
NOT
headers, but they are there (garbage!):
  >
  > +--------------------------------------------------+
  > | headername                                       |
  > +--------------------------------------------------+
  > | "x-copyrighted-material                          |
  > | #content-transfer-encoding                       |
  > | #content-type                                    |
  > | /m                                               |
  > | 0                                                |
  > | 0/x-total-score                                  |
  > | 1                                                |
  > | 2                                                |
  > | 2/x-brightmail-tracker                           |
  > | 2/x-total-score                                  |
  >
  > So yes, the header_cache_readonly = yes will help on this.
  > I'm going to delete the garbage headername's like this one's and
leave  > only the "x-......" and a few extra one's that I know that
are needed,  > and then apply the header_cache_readonly = yes, and
after, truncate the  > headervalue's and dbmail-util -by it.
  >
  > > -----Original Message-----
  > > From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org
[mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On  > > Behalf Of Reindl Harald

Sent: domingo, 14 de Dezembro de 2014 17:21  > > To:
dbmail@dbmail.org  > > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail_headervalue  >

correct  > >  > > keep in mind that "header_cache_readonly =
yes"
will prevent from  > > adding any headers again - i removed all,
inserted the needed  > manually  > > in headernames and than
rebuilt
  > > got rid millions of records forever that way  > >  > > Am
14.12.2014 um 18:10 schrieb Jorge Bastos:
  > > > So,
  > > >
  > > > Truncate dbmail_headername;
  > > > Truncate dbmail_headervalue;
  > > > Dbmail-util -by
  > > >
  > > > During this time only IMAP will compaint since it won't have

headers  > > > to show, but there's no problem to have IMAP users
connecting  > during  > > > this time, when the re-fill is finish,
everything will look normal  > > > on imap clients, right?
  > > >
  > > >> -----Original Message-----
  > > >> From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org
[mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org]
  > > On
  > > >> Behalf Of Reindl Harald
  > > >> Sent: domingo, 14 de Dezembro de 2014 17:03  > > >> To:
dbmail@dbmail.org  > > >> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail_headervalue

  > > >>  > > >> Am 14.12.2014 um 17:59 schrieb Jorge Bastos:
  > > >>> I have allot, I mean, millions of lost records in the  > >
dbmail_headervalue table.
  > > >>>
  > > >>> About 72 million lost records, with dbmail-util it cannot
handle  > > >>> it  > > >> in  > > >>> a workable time.
  > > >>>
  > > >>> Is it safe to truncate the table, and dbmail-util -by it?
  > > >>
  > > >> yes and you should consider "header_cache_readonly = yes"
and
cleanup  > > >> "dbmail_headername" too - maybe that alone will
be
enough to get  > > >> rid of 90%  > > >>  > > >> MariaDB [dbmail]>
select * from dbmail_headername;  > > >>
+--------+-------------------+
  > > >> | id     | headername        |
  > > >> +--------+-------------------+
  > > >> |    183 | cc                |
  > > >> |      8 | content-type      |
  > > >> |      1 | date              |
  > > >> |      2 | from              |
  > > >> |     62 | importance        |
  > > >> |     44 | in-reply-to       |
  > > >> |      3 | message-id        |
  > > >> |      9 | mime-version      |
  > > >> | 111813 | newsgroups        |
  > > >> |    380 | priority          |
  > > >> |     47 | references        |
  > > >> |     38 | reply-to          |
  > > >> |     68 | status            |
  > > >> |      6 | subject           |
  > > >> |     69 | thread-index      |
  > > >> |    179 | thread-topic      |
  > > >> |      7 | to                |
  > > >> | 109464 | x-msmail-priority |
  > > >> | 111823 | x-msoesrec        |
  > > >> | 109408 | x-priority        |
  > > >> | 111825 | x-ref             |
  > > >> +--------+-------------------+  > > >> 21 rows in set (0.00
sec)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Reply via email to