Nice, just for verification! thanks guys!
2014-11-02 15:00 GMT+01:00 Paul J Stevens <p...@nfg.nl>: > > > On 31-10-14 10:54, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 31.10.2014 um 10:44 schrieb Matt .: >>> Yes we did, but as in performance and security I want to inform myself >>> as good as I can. >>> >>> There are spamfilters in front, and also outgoing spamfilters are >>> there. The only question is... is it a performance issue too to have >>> Postfix locally ? Most services are seperated here per box. >> >> no - LMTP is more or less the same as SMTP >> >> so if you handle your incoming load with SMTP over WAN you handle also >> the LMTP load inside the LAN and you should *in general* limit the LMTP >> deliveries to only one at the same time in case of dbmail-lmtpd > > Indeed. I *never* run an incoming MTA on the imap/pop3 hosts if I can > avoid it. LMTP was designed for this. > > mailbox_transport = lmtp:[dbmail]:24 > virtual_transport = lmtp:[dbmail]:24 > > where 'dbmail' can be any IP or hostname you prefer. Of course, normal > latency considerations apply. > > > -- > ________________________________________________________________ > Paul J Stevens pjstevns @ gmail, twitter, github, linkedin > www.nfg.nl/i...@nfg.nl/+31.85.877.99.97 > _______________________________________________ > DBmail mailing list > DBmail@dbmail.org > http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
