-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

If you can, test the master-HEAD. It contains all coverity fixes I
could find. I will not run coverity against 3.1

On 20-07-14 19:06, Reindl Harald wrote:
> 77d17ca7724c32dba27eb187d4abfa129ccf6c4e is *way better* but still 
> not error free, can you please fire coverity again because i think 
> it's more effective than me building and testing a lot of versions 
> over hours - smells like one remaining buffer overflow / underrun
> 
> * "Ostrava Tuesday morning" no longer broken * "Panel: E-Mail-Debug
> - IMAP-POP3-Download" 4 out of 1000 broken * i have attached the 4
> diff-files * all 4 still always identical broken * two times POP3 *
> two times IMAP
> 
> additional info:
> 
> * "Ostrava Tuesday morning" with 23,40 KB *no error* on 100 loops *
> "Panel: E-Mail-Debug - IMAP-POP3-Download" is 380 KB large
> 
> so it seems larger messages are more likely to reprocude the
> problem, but that's a error rate which let me put
> 77d17ca7724c32dba27eb187d4abfa129ccf6c4e in production because
> better than current 8a042214ae1d120581740020f4e73c3cf8d3a6c0 
> ___________________________________________________

> my stress-test complained within 25 minutes 5 times
> 
> "multipart_message_3", "message_rfc822" and "multipart_message_2" 
> are from the dbmail-testsuite, "Test 5" is one of my past problem 
> cases
> 
> Jul 20 18:37:13 POP3 24: EXPECTED:
> 2210e351665b9771a6eefab2cb0c8bf43a04fcea / FOUND: 
> 97039dbf12052e527808ca16188971a405fcb529 (multipart_message_3)
> 
> Jul 20 18:41:48 POP3 28: EXPECTED:
> 60dd43bb886f6c47d89b5dc3ab3f7f764b68eb2e / FOUND: 
> b99c389d3479d8d407d43045bcd99219e51a8977 (message_rfc822)
> 
> Jul 20 18:45:53 POP3 25: EXPECTED:
> 0e2409bcf6921c5da801e1bf4ca4f57be9f07775 / FOUND: 
> 3ef1aef632e08eef66d77e5a97091797640f3192 (multipart_message_2)
> 
> Jul 20 18:47:00 POP3 01: EXPECTED:
> 04073992ce1c1e75d9bd88e0388486dcc80df627 / FOUND: 
> af6836092d12edbb8be1396ad5af08c804fad2fb (Test 5)
> 
> Jul 20 18:54:47 POP3 01: EXPECTED:
> 04073992ce1c1e75d9bd88e0388486dcc80df627 / FOUND: 
> af6836092d12edbb8be1396ad5af08c804fad2fb (Test 5)
> 
> Am 20.07.2014 17:36, schrieb Reindl Harald (mobile):
>> I will give it a try after back at home
>> 
>> if the other reconstruct problem under load still exists i try to
>> get back release version to release version until it is away and
>> want the commits after upwards
>> 
>> that sort of regressions was solved for sure because we both
>> spent a lot of hours last year and finally there where load tests
>> over hours without a single mismatch
>> 
>> However, if we really find a guilty commit the interesting
>> question will be what assumption leaded to that exactly code and
>> how to prevent similar bugs - Autotest are great but can't replay
>> real world mixed load, even my stress tests are synthetic at the
>> end of the day and can't really simulate 50 different clients at
>> the same time acting on completely different messages and what no
>> test ever will reproduce is the memory state with possible leaks
>> part of the game after several days of running
>> 
>> the race bug on the other hand seems to be worst after restart
>> the service - very strange
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: Paul J Stevens
>> <p...@nfg.nl> Gesendet: 20. Juli 2014 17:00:15 MESZ An: DBMail
>> mailinglist <dbmail@dbmail.org> Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] 3.1.16
>> regression -> Re: DBMail 3.1.16 released (Re: corrupted
>> multi-mime messages)
>> 
>> I can't believe this passed the tests, since this exact message
>> is part of the test-suite. Seems the test itself was broken :-(
>> 
>> I just pushed a fix. *Please* test!
>> 
>> On 20-07-14 14:12, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> CAUTION
>> 
>>> 3.1.16 at least has a regression in case of the commit below
>>> that's a different problem and the testmessage with downgrading
>>> is reconstructed proper 
>>> http://git.dbmail.eu/paul/dbmail/commit/?h=dbmail_3_1&id=8a042214ae1d120581740020f4e73c3cf8d3a6c0
>>
>>>
>>> 
however, the mime-part-id problem is still the same under load
>> 
>>> i sent Paul some debug data offlist because they contain real 
>>> messages i am allowed by the mailowner to forward only that
>>> way, not in public
>> 
>>> Regards Harry
>> 
>>> Am 20.07.2014 13:38, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>>> *attached* a compressed example *diff* broken / non-broken
>>>> copy while compare the same mail IMAP / POP3 in a loop
>>>> 
>>>> 33 out of 1000 always identically broken
>>>> 
>>>> it don't matter on which test message i start the loop the
>>>> result is the same in case of multi-mime mails
>>>> 
>>>> fact is there are times while running mixed load for a minute
>>>> not a single one get broken and in random time windows any
>>>> multimime message for some seconds is damaged the same way 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 
that below is the temp-folder where the loop stores diffs look at
>>>> the number at the end, that's the loop-comuter
>>>> 
>>>> at the begin of the loop a horrible result with 19 broken
>>>> copies in serie and later 118-125 are again 8 in serie and
>>>> they all have the same difference as "example-diff.zip"
>>>> 
>>>> the mixed load now get "multipart_message_3" instead 
>>>> "multipart_message_6" most of the time broken 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 
dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_002.diff
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_003.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_004.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_005.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_006.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_007.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_009.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_010.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_011.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_012.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_013.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_014.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_015.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_016.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_017.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_018.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_019.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_020.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_021.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_084.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_089.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_118.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_119.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_120.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_121.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_122.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_123.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_124.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_125.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_335.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_364.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_380.diff 
>>>> dbmail_c6442c520ba8b8a45f1751eb666caeec9ea1ed40_6_707.diff 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 
>>>> Jul 20 13:26:56 POP3 33: EXPECTED: 
>>>> 16292abceedfc6f37707cb1adf35e1e1a46d7d2b / FOUND: 
>>>> bd17702e6872ebdd60c38f7ef439f9f30a5b9721 (Ostrava Tuesday 
>>>> morning) Jul 20 13:26:56 IMAP 24: EXPECTED: 
>>>> 2210e351665b9771a6eefab2cb0c8bf43a04fcea / FOUND: 
>>>> 97039dbf12052e527808ca16188971a405fcb529
>>>> (multipart_message_3) Jul 20 13:26:56 IMAP 33: EXPECTED: 
>>>> 16292abceedfc6f37707cb1adf35e1e1a46d7d2b / FOUND: 
>>>> bd17702e6872ebdd60c38f7ef439f9f30a5b9721 (Ostrava Tuesday 
>>>> morning) Jul 20 13:27:23 POP3 33: EXPECTED: 
>>>> 16292abceedfc6f37707cb1adf35e1e1a46d7d2b / FOUND: 
>>>> bd17702e6872ebdd60c38f7ef439f9f30a5b9721 (Ostrava Tuesday 
>>>> morning) Jul 20 13:27:23 IMAP 24: EXPECTED: 
>>>> 2210e351665b9771a6eefab2cb0c8bf43a04fcea / FOUND: 
>>>> 97039dbf12052e527808ca16188971a405fcb529
>>>> (multipart_message_3) Jul 20 13:27:23 IMAP 33: EXPECTED: 
>>>> 16292abceedfc6f37707cb1adf35e1e1a46d7d2b / FOUND: 
>>>> bd17702e6872ebdd60c38f7ef439f9f30a5b9721 (Ostrava Tuesday 
>>>> morning) Jul 20 13:27:52 POP3 33: EXPECTED: 
>>>> 16292abceedfc6f37707cb1adf35e1e1a46d7d2b / FOUND: 
>>>> bd17702e6872ebdd60c38f7ef439f9f30a5b9721 (Ostrava Tuesday 
>>>> morning) Jul 20 13:27:52 IMAP 24: EXPECTED: 
>>>> 2210e351665b9771a6eefab2cb0c8bf43a04fcea / FOUND: 
>>>> 97039dbf12052e527808ca16188971a405fcb529
>>>> (multipart_message_3) Jul 20 13:27:52 IMAP 33: EXPECTED: 
>>>> 16292abceedfc6f37707cb1adf35e1e1a46d7d2b / FOUND: 
>>>> bd17702e6872ebdd60c38f7ef439f9f30a5b9721 (Ostrava Tuesday 
>>>> morning) Jul 20 13:28:15 POP3 33: EXPECTED: 
>>>> 16292abceedfc6f37707cb1adf35e1e1a46d7d2b / FOUND: 
>>>> bd17702e6872ebdd60c38f7ef439f9f30a5b9721 (Ostrava Tuesday 
>>>> morning) Jul 20 13:28:15 IMAP 24: EXPECTED: 
>>>> 2210e351665b9771a6eefab2cb0c8bf43a04fcea / FOUND: 
>>>> 97039dbf12052e527808ca16188971a405fcb529
>>>> (multipart_message_3) Jul 20 13:28:15 IMAP 33: EXPECTED: 
>>>> 16292abceedfc6f37707cb1adf35e1e1a46d7d2b / FOUND: 
>>>> bd17702e6872ebdd60c38f7ef439f9f30a5b9721 (Ostrava Tuesday 
>>>> morning) Am 20.07.2014 12:56, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>>>> Hi Paul
>>>>> 
>>>>> sorry but still unconfirmed
>>>>> 
>>>>> see attached screenshot of debug-interface as well as 
>>>>> "stress-test.txt" which normally should not output
>>>>> anything because it prcatically makes a lot of noise while
>>>>> check again and aagin the same messages against known
>>>>> checksums
>>>>> 
>>>>> the "Ostrava Tuesday morning" and "multipart_message_6"
>>>>> which is from the dbmail-autotests imported on my IMAP
>>>>> seems to get most likely broken, but others to randomly
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Ostrava Tuesday morning is the one with context to 
>>>>> "8a042214ae1d120581740020f4e73c3cf8d3a6c0" and was the
>>>>> first customer complaint
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards Harry
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am 20.07.2014 12:30, schrieb Paul J Stevens:
>>>>>> It was a buffer overrun which has now been fixed to the
>>>>>> best of my abilities.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've done another round of coverity analysis on the
>>>>>> master branch, and this doesn't trigger any new warnings
>>>>>> with regard to mentioned fix which is also in the
>>>>>> dbmail_3_1 branch.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've just tagged and thereby released 3.1.16 which
>>>>>> contains just this fix.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Being on vacation, I don't have full access to my usual 
>>>>>> release scripts (home-network is unreachable), so a tag
>>>>>> will have to do.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But I've also uploaded the tar file seperately to 
>>>>>> www.dbmail.org, so all the usual download locations
>>>>>> should work.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 18-07-14 23:05, Reindl Harald (mobile) wrote:
>>>>>>> Interesting - your attachment showed exactly the same
>>>>>>> bug I have only randomly for whatever type of messages
>>>>>>> and only under load
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I would sell my soul for a predictable reproducer
>>>>>>> because in that case debug logging / gdb / strace could
>>>>>>> shed some light and since it's always the same want
>>>>>>> finally happens it's pretty sure only a few lines of
>>>>>>> code in dbmail to fix it
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I am still sure it's exactly the same code path in both
>>>>>>> of our cases and only the trigger to went that path is 
>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Maybe Paul has some idea how you can provide debug
>>>>>>> info's since you are able to isolate what happens while
>>>>>>> my trigger ends in a large mess of mixed debug logs
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von:
>>>>>>> Guilherme Souza <gslso...@gmail.com> Gesendet: 18. Juli
>>>>>>> 2014 21:20:35 MESZ An: DBMail mailinglist
>>>>>>> <dbmail@dbmail.org> Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] corrupted
>>>>>>> multi-mime messages
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I was no able to reply to your message. In my case is
>>>>>>> not random.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Every message html formatted with an attached file sent
>>>>>>> by ensignia webmail shows the same missing boundaries.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Every message sent by roundcube or thunderbird shows 
>>>>>>> correctly.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Reindl Harald (mobile)
>>>>>>>  <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> That is exactly what i reported a few days ago -
>>>>>>>> that's for sure a race condition in reconstruction
>>>>>>>> because i get predictable identical broken messages
>>>>>>>> in a loop while mixed load on my testserver - at the
>>>>>>>> same machine 1000 loops receive the same message
>>>>>>>> without other clients no broken one
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ DBmail mailing
> list DBmail@dbmail.org 
> http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
> 

- -- 
________________________________________________________________
Paul J Stevens       pjstevns @ gmail, twitter, github, linkedin
           www.nfg.nl/i...@nfg.nl/+31.85.877.99.97
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlPMDs8ACgkQ8iITvBH4zTHQuwCeIktGVQN1UEdB9iZN0+KsZ10O
WZQAmgKiyMDSiPgOwc5RsRiIX8SYZnQM
=qjVR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Reply via email to