On 04/10/2012 02:54 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> hm, should we not respect
> 
>  * Precedence: bulk
>  * Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
> 
> after 
> http://git.dbmail.eu/paul/dbmail/commit/?id=7216ea4732dc0ad5eb66c76e378af3ea7a34ba4a
> 
> in dbmail-autoreply?

Maybe we should ignore messages with Precedence: bulk as an additional
restriction.

> 
> today/tonight i added both headers to our lib which generates
> newsletters and other automated messages - dbmail still sends
> a reply to such messages, i guess the intention of this
> headers in the above commit is to prevent other servers
> sending replies to us :-)

Don't use the To or Cc header for such messages. Use the envelope.

Or in PHP terms: never use 'mail' (which sucks for many reasons), but
use the Pear::Net_SMTP package.



-- 
________________________________________________________________
Paul J Stevens        pjstevns @ gmail, twitter, skype, linkedin

  * Premium Hosting Services and Web Application Consultancy *

           www.nfg.nl/i...@nfg.nl/+31.85.877.99.97
________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Reply via email to