Am 02.04.2012 12:45, schrieb Paul J Stevens: > On 04/02/2012 12:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> this is not really a problem and is triggered >> by the fact the we truncated only the header-tables >> while the references table had already data >> > > Correct. > >> more a problem is that headervalues is growing and >> growing over the time and after few months it >> uses more index-space as the rest of the database > > Prune it! > > http://blog.dbmail.eu/archives/12-Pruning-the-dbmail_headervalue-table.html
hm - don't get me wrong but should dbmail not avoid to insert unused records there? the more problem currently is that it contains even headers of long time deleted messages and will not be cleaned at all
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
