Hello, I don't know what the implications are with multiple recipients, but if a similar field were added for lmtp lookups, it'd be very efficient, and as you said, would be a feature dbmail had that others didn't.
A possible workaround if you're using postfix is to define 2 different transports, each with it's own size= parameter, and get postfix to lookup the right transport on delivery (ie. you'd want it to read the value from a database table using the email address/alias as the key). There're example config setups in the list archives here (maybe not for transport table lookups, but it's almost identical to local_recipient_maps). Jn ---- Original Message ---- From: James XMS <dbmail@dbmail.org> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], DBMail mailinglist <dbmail@dbmail.org>, Micah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Feature Request. Per User Attachment Quota. Sent: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:53:29 +0000 > It would be great if someone could point me in the right direction on how to > do > that, or even better integrate it into dbmail so there isn't the slowdown of > spawning a perl script or whatever every time a mail is delivered. > > Cheers > James > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:43 , Micah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: > > > > >I understand now, it's a mail size limit on a user level, not a system wide > >limit.. Sorry.. I'm sure you can do that now with dbmail if you pipe things > >through a custom script. You could write a perl script or something that > >would send a rejection note if the mail was too big, otherwise it would just > >deliver it. > > > >-Micah > > > >On Monday 28 June 2004 10:37 am, James XMS wrote: > >> I'm not sure i understand what you mean exatly, but my problem is that the > >> managing directors of my company want to be able to recieve mails of up to > >> 15mb, whereas standard users should only be able to receive mails of up to > >> 3mb. > >> > >> Cheers > >> James > >> > >> On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:25 , Micah [EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: > >> >Not to be a stick in the mud, but why not just limit the overall size of > >> > the email? You're not likely to get a 1megabyte email with no > >> > attachments. This is what I do, but I'll admit I don't know the > >> > particulars of your situation. > >> > > >> >Just curious, > >> >-Micah > >> > > >> >On Monday 28 June 2004 10:08 am, James XMS wrote: > >> >> Hi All, > >> >> > >> >> I have recently come to a situation where i need to set incoming > >> >> attachment size limits for managers/users within my company. > >> >> > >> >> After speaking to postfix guru's everyone came to the decision that > >> >> there was no way to do it at MTA level. > >> >> > >> >> Therefore, i would like to make a feature request that dbmail could > >> >> check attachment sizes on incoming mail against a field in the dbmail > >> >> database for a user and accept/reject the mail accordingly. > >> >> > >> >> Let me know what you all think, because i believe that this is one of > >> >> those little things that could set dbmail in a class of its own ( not > >> >> that its not already :) ). > >> >> > >> >> Cheers > >> >> James > >> >> > >> >> --- Msg sent via @Mail - http://atmail.nl/ > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Dbmail mailing list > >> >> Dbmail@dbmail.org > >> >> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > >> > >> --- Msg sent via @Mail - http://atmail.nl/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Dbmail mailing list > >> Dbmail@dbmail.org > >> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > > > > > > --- Msg sent via @Mail - http://atmail.nl/ > _______________________________________________ > Dbmail mailing list > Dbmail@dbmail.org > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail > -- End Original Message -- -- Jesse Norell [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not my email address; change "administrator" to my first name. --
