One silly question,
How do we know which headers to cache?
The headers are stored in the first messageblock in for the message.
Suppose we stored the headers in a separate table and used the
database indexing facilities.
We could then do without a separate header cache, by just using
well formulated queries.
/Magnus
Mark Mackay - Orcon wrote:
Hi guys -
Another quick question (first time I've really looked at 2.0 other than
listening to the list).
Is 2.0 going to have any type of header cache (something that's suited to
the native-webmail clients everyone's no-doubt hacking away at? We
implemented some patches to 1.x and posted them to a list a while back which
cached the:
- size
- attachement (y/n)
- to
- from
- subject
- priority
- sent-date
- received-date
from message when they came in... I notice the 2.0 schema doesn't seem to
have anything in it for this (may have overlooked it, hopefully not going
blind). Is this planned or can it be? ;) ?
Cheers,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
Dbmail mailing list
Dbmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
