On Saturday 12 October 2002 07:37 am, Ryan Butler wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 05:19, Eric Renfro wrote:
> > Well, after hammering, and hammering away with dbmail, after 1.0rc4's
> > release, I plucked it right into my exim configuration, and so far, all
>
> The forwards table isn't necessary, the aliases table can take non-local
> addresses as arguments to the deliver_to field.

Hrmm.. That I did not know. But it's also a matter of letting my MTA handle 
forwards directly, instead of passing it to dbmail-smtp to handle it, though, 
I guess with a decent PgSQL view, I could make it work just the same based on 
the aliases, and users tables where aliases.deliver_to doesn't link to a 
users.user_idnr. :)

> > Second.
> >
> > I wanted to know how would be a good routine for nightly maintenance with
> > dbmail-maintenance. What command-line options should I use, to perform a
>
> -dfp are the options I use for dbmail-maintenance

Hrmm. Everytime I used dbmail-maintenance -cifdp, it runs through, but does 
nothing, no matter how many times I run it, and knowing there's been mail 
deleted, an example of the results:

*** dbmail-maintenance ***
Opening connection to the database... Ok. Connected
Deleting messages with DELETE status... Ok. [0] messages deleted.
Setting DELETE status for deleted messages... Ok. [0] messages set for 
deletion.
Now checking DBMAIL messageblocks integrity.. Ok. Found 0 unconnected 
messageblks.
--- checking block integrity took 1 seconds
--- checking block integrity took 1 seconds
Now checking DBMAIL message integrity.. Ok. Found 0 unconnected messages.
--- checking message integrity took 0 seconds
--- checking message integrity took 0 seconds
Now checking DBMAIL mailbox integrity.. Ok. Found 0 unconnected mailboxes.
--- checking mailbox integrity took 0 seconds
--- checking mailbox integrity took 0 seconds
Cleaning up database structure... Ok. Database cleaned up.
Maintenance done.

This is /after/ almost 24 hours the dbmail server's been up and in use, and I 
have KMail checking email every 10 minutes, deleting POP3 mail once it's out 
of there.

> > And then some future goals/questions?
> > With the numbers on dbmail.org on the status of the project being 99% in
>
> Those #'s are really really old, like around RC-1 timeframe, so most of
> them are probably gonna be in 1.0

Heh, well, my list was down below --v

> > AUTH methods, such as CRAM-MD5 and DIGEST-MD5, will they be supported?
> > (preferably without SASL getting in the way? <G>)
>
> Well, the latest draft of the IMAP rfc has wording REQUIRING some form
> of encrypted auth mechanism, or plaintext auth over SSL, which was an
> IETF requirement.  So I'd say that will be on the TODO list, but dunno
> how soon.

Well, CRAM-MD5, and DIGEST-MD5, are their own encryption in their own ways. 
Both use a challenge & response approach. And both require a plaintext 
password to be stored for AUTH because they both use unreversable encryption 
algorithms to test against a plaintext password.

That was another one on my list. SSL. Is there a way to get SSL/TLS with 
dbmail at this time, or will that require stunnelling (if possible?)

Eric Renfro

Reply via email to