Hi!
If using Qmail, 64 would be considered a hard error resulting in a bouce of the
message.
Could you add something in the config telling dbmail if it is beeing triggered
by
postfix or qmail?
I'm submitting the qmail error codes below.
0 delivery successful. Continue with next command. (Normal)
99 delivery successful. Don't sent to next command.
100 har error permanent failiure. (Like user does not exist).
111 soft error. Put back in queue and retry later.
Currently 64, 65, 70, 76, 77, 78, and 112 are considered
hard errors, and all other codes are considered soft errors,
but command should avoid relying on this.
More info on http://www.qmail.org/man/man8/qmail-command.html
Fredrik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Michah,
>
> This is true, dbmail will send a signal (64 i believe) to postfix to let
> it know that the message should be put back into the queue instead of
> being dropped.
>
> The weird thing is that the message is eventually delivered. If it
> happends again, please send me a copy of the message.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eelco
>
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Micah Stevens wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:04:34 -0700
> > From: Micah Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: dbmail@dbmail.org
> > To: dbmail@dbmail.org
> > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Death by signal 11
> >
> > Hi Eelco,
> >
> > Thanks for your interest, if you recall reading a previous post I made to
> > the list, I was having a problem with messages being redelivered many
> > times. As I'm looking at this report (I posted the whole thing below for
> > your reference) It appears that this is probably related. You'll notice
> > that there are 398 deferrals, and 398 signal 11 errors. If Postfix sees the
> > signal 11 error, perhaps will it keep the message in the queue and try and
> > deliver it later? I was receiving the mail in the database, so perhaps
> > after inserting the data dbmail-smtp it was dying. This problem that I had
> > was cleared up by updating from the CVS version I had to the CVS snapshot
> > as of the 30th.
> >
> > I'd love to forward you a copy of one of the deferred mails, but I erased
> > them all with the dbmail-maintenance program this morning.
> >
> > -Micah
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: raincross-tech.com Daily Mail Report for Tuesday, 30 July 2002
> > Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 04:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (root)
> >
> >
> > Grand Totals
> > ------------
> > messages
> > 12 received
> > 26 delivered
> > 0 forwarded
> > 16 deferred (398 deferrals)
> > 0 bounced
> > 0 rejected
> > 38890 bytes received
> > 139607 bytes delivered
> > 5 senders
> > 4 sending hosts/domains
> > 7 recipients
> > 3 recipient hosts/domains
> >
> > message deferral detail
> > -----------------------
> > pipe
> > 398 Command died with signal 11: "/usr/local/sbin/dbmail-smtp"
> > Warnings
> > --------
> > cleanup
> > 10 database /etc/postfix/virtual.db is older than source file /etc...
> > postfix-script
> > 1 /var/spool/postfix/etc/passwd and /etc/passwd differ
> > smtpd
> > 7 database /etc/postfix/virtual.db is older than source file /etc...
> > Fatal Errors: none
> > Panics: none
> > Per-Day Traffic Summary
> > date received delivered deferred bounced rejected
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 2002-07-28 0 0 256
> > 2002-07-29 10 24 142
> > 2002-07-30 2 2
> > Per-Hour Traffic Daily Average
> > time received delivered deferred bounced rejected
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 00:00-01:00 0 0 3 0 0
> > 01:00-02:00 0 0 5 0 0
> > 02:00-03:00 0 0 5 0 0
> > 03:00-04:00 0 0 2 0 0
> > 04:00-05:00 1 0 11 0 0
> > 05:00-06:00 0 0 10 0 0
> > 06:00-07:00 0 0 10 0 0
> > 07:00-08:00 0 0 7 0 0
> > 08:00-09:00 0 0 10 0 0
> > 09:00-10:00 0 0 9 0 0
> > 10:00-11:00 0 4 5 0 0
> > 11:00-12:00 1 2 5 0 0
> > 12:00-13:00 0 0 5 0 0
> > 13:00-14:00 0 0 5 0 0
> > 14:00-15:00 1 1 3 0 0
> > 15:00-16:00 0 0 5 0 0
> > 16:00-17:00 0 0 5 0 0
> > 17:00-18:00 0 0 1 0 0
> > 18:00-19:00 0 0 5 0 0
> > 19:00-20:00 0 0 5 0 0
> > 20:00-21:00 1 1 5 0 0
> > 21:00-22:00 0 0 5 0 0
> > 22:00-23:00 0 0 5 0 0
> > 23:00-24:00 0 0 5 0 0
> > Host/Domain Summary: Message Delivery (top 10)
> > sent cnt bytes defers avg dly max dly host/domain
> > -------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -----------
> > 18 132103 290 31.7 h 67.5 h raincross-tech.com
> > 7 6518 108 38.5 h 67.7 h 2dogspetsupply.com
> > 1 986 0 1.0 s 1.0 s 9250x.com
> > Host/Domain Summary: Messages Received (top 10)
> > msg cnt bytes host/domain
> > -------- ------- -----------
> > 5 27154 raincross-tech.com
> > 5 4275 9250x.com
> > 1 5789 oscommerce.com
> > 1 1672 charge.he.net
> > top 10 Senders by message count
> > -------------------------------
> > 5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > top 10 Recipients by message count
> > ----------------------------------
> > 6 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 6 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > top 10 Senders by message size
> > ------------------------------
> > 26168 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 5789 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 4275 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 1672 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 986 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > top 10 Recipients by message size
> > ---------------------------------
> > 62716 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 56507 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 10026 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 5655 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 2854 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 986 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 863 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > At 09:46 PM 7/30/2002 +0200, you wrote:
> > >Hi Michah,
> > >
> > >I'm very curious about your segfault. Could you send me the e-mail message
> > >on which dbmail-smtp dies? (postcat on the queue file will do the trick)
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >
> > >Eelco
> > >
> > >
> > >On 30-07-2002 20:02, "Micah Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm using:
> > > >
> > > > Postfix 1.1.10 with the mysql patch.
> > > > MySQL 4.0.2-2
> > > > DBMail - I'm not sure how to find out this version, I got it from CVS on
> > > > 7-28-02. I assume that would be after the bugfix you spoke of?
> > > >
> > > > This version was an upgrade that solved some other problems I was having
> > > > with pop3d crashing.
> > > >
> > > > -Micah
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > At 06:31 PM 7/30/2002 +0200, you wrote:
> > > >> Hi Micah,
> > > >>
> > > >> What version are you using?
> > > >> There was a 'bug' in previous version which was caused by \0 in a the
> > > >> pipe
> > > >> stream from postfix. The dbmail-smtp program assumed that this could
> > > not be
> > > >> happening. This should however be fixed in the newest release.
> > > >>
> > > >> What dbase are you using as backend?
> > > >>
> > > >> Best regards,
> > > >>
> > > >> Eelco
> > > >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dbmail mailing list
> > Dbmail@dbmail.org
> > https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
> >
>
> __________________________
> E.J.A. van Beek
> ICT Manager
> IC&S
> T: +31 30 2322878
> F: +31 30 2322305
>
> PGP-key:
> www.ic-s.nl/keys/eelco.txt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dbmail mailing list
> Dbmail@dbmail.org
> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
