Terry,
That response time issue between the 2 versions may be the case for me too. 
However after upgrading I can't compare anymore, since I deleted all my 3.0.2 
edits (I am a newbie and consider all I did as learning material). One 
possibility is that on a zoomed-out image the math is done in the cpu rather 
than in the gpu. I suspect this because of the much faster reponse of the 
export versus the response on the zoomed-out image. Not sure how I can monitor 
this, but I will try in the coming days.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Marc.


> Op 19 aug. 2020 om 01:46 heeft Thierry Rakotoarivelo <tr.d...@gmail.com> het 
> volgende geschreven:
> 
> Thanks Marc and others that sent direct inputs.
> 
> Your comment @Marc made me test a few scenarios, and indeed it seems like the 
> issue comes with v 3.2.1 when I re-edit an already edited (zoomed-out) image 
> with a history stack comprising +40 items (similar to you including multiple 
> instances of the same module). I note that I did not get such a slow response 
> on the same image with the same history stack with v 3.0.* though.
> 
> I found that compressing the history stack greatly mitigate the issue, e.g. 
> on an image with +60 history items (a poorly exposed green-ish underwater 
> photo with lots of backscatter), hitting Compress History reduces the stack 
> to 25-ish items, and the module sliders become much more responsive upon 
> re-editing. It is still not as smooth on the same image (with compressed 
> stack) as with v 3.0.*. However, it's smooth enough to be usable and I 
> decided to re-upgrade to and use v 3.2.1.
> 
> (the puzzling thing is that during the 1st original edit session of such an 
> image with +60 items in the history stack, the sliders of all used modules 
> and new instances are very responsive... so maybe there are some processing 
> strategies used at that time that are not later used on re-edit? I might post 
> this note on the devs on their github project)
> 
> Thanks again for your inputs!
> Cheers,
> T.
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 12:45 AM <marc.ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thierry,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I am a newbie since July. 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> FYI my current dt 3.2.1 response time appreciation is as follows.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I upgraded from dt 3.0.2 to dt 3.2.1 under Windows 10.  I only see degrading 
>> response time, also on the module sliders, when zooming out on an already 
>> edited image with a large module stack with a few masks and denoise 
>> (profiled) activated (sometimes more than 1 instance). On the contrary, 
>> exporting such an image happens in only a bit more time than a fit-to-screen 
>> image change on the GUI after a module slider change. I consider this as 
>> ‘normal’ behaviour. My laptop is an high-end (kind of) gaming laptop with a 
>> discrete GPU and a (color accurate) 4K display.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Marc.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Van: Thierry Rakotoarivelo <tr.d...@gmail.com> 
>> Verzonden: dinsdag 18 augustus 2020 10:05
>> Aan: darktable-user@lists.darktable.org
>> Onderwerp: [darktable-user] v.3.2.1 slow when re-editing a photo (Win10)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I have been running Darktable on Windows10 for a couple of years now, and 
>> very happy with it, thanks a lot to the DT team for all the work in 
>> developing and maintaining this software!
>> 
>> I upgraded to v 3.2.1 (from v. 3.0) last week. I had no issue with loading 
>> new photos and making adjustments to them in the Darkroom mode. However I 
>> ran into an issue when I close the software once I am done with my editing 
>> and then re-start it to re-edit the same photo.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> So when I start such a new session of DT and try to re-edit a photo that I 
>> edited earlier, every interactions with any modules is really really slow, 
>> e.g. moving the sliders take many seconds to update on the UI control (>10 
>> s) and then many more seconds to actually refresh the preview (>> 10 s). 
>> This is independent of the image having a history stack of a couple of steps 
>> or +10 steps. Also in the same session, if I open and edit a freshly new 
>> photo that I have not yet edited before, this problem does not happen, i.e. 
>> for the new photo the UI and Preview are responding at a "normal" speed. 
>> Thus this seems to happen only on photos that were edited in a previous 
>> session.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Not sure if it is relevant here, but please note that I also have "Write in 
>> XMP sidecar" option enabled.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Any help on solving that slowness issue with v 3.2.1 when re-opening a 
>> previously edited photo would be great! Right now I downgraded to the 
>> previous v 3.0. Thanks!
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Terry.
>> 
>> 
>> ____________________________________________________________________________ 
>> darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to 
>> darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org 
>> =

____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Reply via email to