In the module import, there is "parameters" & the "ignore jpegs". When you export, you can choose the destination. Read the manual.
Le sam. 20 févr. 2021 à 09:43, Bertwim <b...@xs4all.nl> a écrit : > I might do that, but I am considering implementing it myself. > I am not very familiar with the darktable internals (yet), Perhaps > somebody from this dev-list kan give some suggestions how to tackle the > problem. > > > > Regards, > Bertwim > > On 2/20/21 9:31 AM, Martin Straeten wrote: > > Then you may file a feature request at > https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/issues/new?assignees=&labels=&template=feature_request.md&title= > and > be patient until someone implements it ... > > Am 20.02.2021 um 09:23 schrieb Bertwim <b...@xs4all.nl> <b...@xs4all.nl>: > > Hi Martin, > > Sure, but that is not what I am looking for. I don't want unnecessary > being being generated. > > Kind Regards, > Bertwim > > On 2/20/21 7:31 AM, Martin Straeten wrote: > > You can use the collection filters just to display edited images using > darktable related tagging > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > > Then ctrl+a and save xmp file > > > Am 19.02.2021 um 22:46 schrieb Bertwim <b...@xs4all.nl> <b...@xs4all.nl>: > > Hi, > > My camera creates an image both in raw format (Nikon, nef) and a jpg. When > the camera-produced jpg is good enough, I just want to keep it, leaving it > untouched by DT. No xmp-file needed or even desired. For the others > pictures, I use DT to process the the raw image and export a new jpg, > overwriting the original camera-produced jpg. For those pictures I want the > xmp file. > In other words, I would like to have an xmp file *only* for those images > that I have actually edited. No no xmp-files for images that I have not > touched/edited. > > I don''t think DT is currently providing this in a convenient way. It can > write xmp files automatically for *all* images, but that is too much. > It is possible to achieve this selective xmp-export manually by first > selecting in lightroom the 'untouched' images, inverting this selection and > then choose "write sidecar files' in the history stack menu. This however, is > cumbersome, tedious and error prone. I am looking for a more robust and > automated way to achieve the same. > It would make sense I think to write an xmp file together with the export, So > I was thinking if I could add this option to the code. > > I would value some comments or feedback if this option would be worthwhile to > pursue. > > Kind Regards, > Bertwim > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
