Thanks for the great work. Darktable becomes better day after day. One personal note on the default scene-referred process: filmic RGB v4 is very time-consuming module compared to v3 or base curve. On my PC the difference is over ten times (40 seconds vs 3.6 seconds). The 40 seconds on my old AMD 1075T seem to transfer into about 15 seconds on AMD 2700x comparing their multi-core performance, but 15 seconds for one image is too much. The module itself is great and it produces very nice controllable results, but is it wise to make it default without speed optimizations or OpenCL implementation?
With respect, Alexander Rabtchevich > Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juli 2020 um 16:21 Uhr > Von: "Pascal Obry" <pas...@obry.net> > An: "darktable" <darktable-dev@lists.darktable.org> > Betreff: [darktable-dev] preparing 3.2 > > > @All devs ! > > If you have had some PR merged for 3.2 please can you review the latest > RELEASE_NOTES.md that I have just pushed to ensure I don't have missed > any important entry. > > Also, I think for 3.4 we should concentrate on the documentation which > is now lacking many entries. So if you could write some description for > the manual of the new feature you have added it would be nice. Either > directly into the docbook on the repository with a PR or sending a > plain text + screenshot if needed to me that I will volunteer to commit > at the right place. > > Thanks all for the contributions! > > -- > Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) > > The best way to travel is by means of imagination > > http://www.obry.net > > gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
