Hey guys, sorry for the late reply, hard week at work last week. @David
> > I have some other suggestions to get the user informed about the > potential signal processing disaster when ordering the pixel pipe modules > badly relatively to the color space. > > I would be very interested to read your suggestion. > This is really not the initial topic of my post but I guess sharing this could be useful. I think that starting by something as simple as putting a little sign like a yellow triangle with an exclamation mark in the title bar a module misplaced regarding what should be done for a regular image processing pipeline would be a good start. Hovering the triangle would display a tooltip explaining the issue and offering a link the the manual or and article on the topic for more detail. Otherwise the most straightforward thing would be to display an information message when the pipeline is "wrongly" ordered regarding image processing theory, using the user information mechanisms already present in the darkroom, maybe adding a "for more info click here" link in the message that would open the manual at this topic or opening a browser to the page of one of the several articles that have been produced on this topic. @jys > This might be enough, at least to start with. This is something most > people would want to change one time, if at all, right? > I would say that once they have been able to change and try between several configurations, they would indeed set it one time and don't touch it anymore. A file config would be a good first POC, but something more GUI doable, with a different user action to do it that the one allowing to reorder the pixel pipe, in order to avoid ambiguity between reordering the pixel pipe (right panel) and modifying the GUI (left panel). Florian Wernert Le mer. 22 janv. 2020 à 23:31, jys <junkyardspar...@yepmail.net> a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020, at 07:33, Florian W wrote: > > > As an alternative, some config file based ordering of the left panel > > would be easier to achieve I guess (and safer considering your point > > #2). > > This might be enough, at least to start with. This is something most > people would want to change one time, if at all, right? > > -- > jys > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
