My wishes and comments are GUI-only and related only to the Favourites tab.
There is another conversation tied into this one about re-ordering the modules in the PP list (the Active tab I suspect because it lists the modules used, and their PP order). I suppose that the two conversations should be split. Mine (re-ordering in Favourites) is a feature request that happened after the closing of the features (I only proposed it because that is when I thought of it) and perhaps discussion about re-ordering Favourites modules should be shelved until 3.0 is out and feature requests can be considered again. On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 1:12 PM Bernhard <darkta...@intervalsignals.org> wrote: > Until now I did not feel the need to change pp since the explanation > given seemed valid to me and I was happy with the results. > When I occasionally saw discussion about GUI improvement and module > order I always thought this is GUI only - which indeed would be a big > improvement for me. > Now everything seems to be different? > In my view there is a risk that the normal user deteriotes the result > more than it would help him - just a thought. > > -- > > regards > Bernhard > > https://www.bilddateien.de > > > > Julian Rickards schrieb am 01.11.19 um 16:11: > > In my opinion, re-ordering the modules in the favourites shouldn't be > > a problem with the pp order. In the same way that you may have written > > down, on paper, the modules you want to use, in the order you want to > > use them, re-ordering favourites in this way shouldn't be any > > different. However, I had recently proposed this as a feature request > > (but after the closure of the feature requests so I didn't expect it > > to be acted upon for 3.0) and it turns out that a couple of others had > > requested this before me (how long before me? I don't know). > > > > I don't want to make a big deal of this or start throwing flames back > > and forth, I just thought this might be useful. > > > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 11:03 AM David Vincent-Jones > > <david...@gmail.com <mailto:david...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > I think that I am relieved .... maybe ... hopefully I did not > > disturb the pp .... now I am confused ... I simply wanted to put > > the favorites in my logical processing order. > > > > David > > > > On 01.11.19 14:18, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > >> * Pascal Obry<pas...@obry.net> <mailto:pas...@obry.net> > [11-01-19 08:01]: > >>> David, > >>> > >>>> Shurely .... changing the order of the modules located in the > >>>> 'favorites' tab does not change the individual modules position in > >>>> the pixel-pipeline? .... that would be unthinkable! > >>> Of course it does! Re-ordering the iop is not for fun, it really > does > >>> change the pixel-pipe order. > >> then cryptomilk's reference should be corrected: > >> See > >> > https://www.darktable.org/usermanual/en/darkroom_concepts.html#pixelpipe > >> > >> as it indicated a static pixelpipe, and really allows unknowing > users > >> ample opportunity to "shoot themselves in their collective feet". > >> > >> also once changed there doesn't appear any option ot restore the > original > >> order to the pixelpipe. ??? > >> > >> tks, > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > <mailto:darktable-dev%2bunsubscr...@lists.darktable.org> > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
