On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Heiko Bauke <heiko.ba...@mail.de> wrote: > although I never investigated these compatibility issues I suspect one cannot > expect much compatibility here. Different raw converters may work very > differently internally. In particular closed source programs are a black box.
Could in fact be a worthwhile project for a weekend to compare the quality / results of different converters. Most of the time I only use standard adjustments like levels, exposure or lens correction. Would be strange if the results for these were largely different... >From what I understand the XMP standard defines the following fields for filters / actions: stEvt:action, type "open Choice": The action that occurred. Defined values are: converted, copied, created, cropped, edited, filtered, formatted, version_updated, printed, published, managed, produced, resized, saved New values should be verbs in the past tense. stEvt:parameters, type "Text": Additional description of the action See http://archimedespalimpsest.net/Documents/External/XMP/XMPSpecificationPart2.pdf Michael ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
