Hi Ulrich .... does the 'cleanup' work globally or is this just for the current image? David
On 04/17/2018 09:27 AM, Ulrich Pegelow wrote: > You don't need to do this manually. Just go into the mask manager (left > hand panel in the darkroom view), press the right mouse button. On the > menu that appears you select "cleanup unused shapes". > > In your case the huge number of invisible shapes comes from the spot > removal tool. The root cause lies in a combination of two facts. > darktable does not delete shapes automatically and spot removal shapes > do not appear in the mask manager. So even if you reset the spot removal > tool all shapes created will still exist in the data set and you do not > even know because the mask manager does not tell you. We should consider > how to change this behavior. > > In the time being you can manually clean up unused shapes with the > method described above. > > ulrich > > > Am 16.04.2018 um 10:55 schrieb Timur Irikovich Davletshin: >> Well, I was able to edit them with sed script to remove all masks, but >> parsing XML to find used/unused masks is beyond my skills (I'm not >> familiar with XMP standards). I believe future DT releases should sort >> this out in some way. At least for this issue is very critical, it >> slows down opening/closing files in my library multiple times. >> >> On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 10:19 +0200, sturmflut wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I can confirm this for the latest version in the darktable-2.4.x >>> branch >>> (commit edf1168371be288f071986d93a47fb3e082573de). The sidecar files >>> seem to contain an awful lot of masks, but I can't seem to see which >>> module even uses them? >>> >>> cheers, >>> Simon >>> >>> >>> On 15.04.2018 20:28, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote: >>>> It looks like I was able to find what action causes this problem. >>>> >>>> Steps to reproduce: >>>> >>>> 1. Download, unpack and import as folder — https://drive.google.com >>>> /ope >>>> n?id=14sZLgnpZSV5W3pw1K_8owHW29Heq9EWz (don't pay attention to >>>> content >>>> and settings) >>>> 2. Choose second picture and click (in lighttable mode) copy >>>> history >>>> stack and choose, let's say, 'shadows and highlights' settings. >>>> 3. Apply it (paste) to first picture, open it, compress history >>>> stack >>>> and close DT. >>>> 4. Now compare XMP files, first one is twice bigger than second one >>>> (in >>>> my case ~700kB vs ~1400kB). Meanwhile in darkroom mode history >>>> stack >>>> looks the same. >>>> >>>> Can anyone comment, what is going on here? >>> >>> _____________________________________________________________________ > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
