Yes, I thought it was amazing too. Thanks for looking into it!

Op zo 15 mei 2016 om 17:40 schreef johannes hanika <hana...@gmail.com>:

> oh, right. thanks for pointing that out. amazing what a difference
> this small change makes. i shall look into pushing that into
> rawspeed's camera.xml then.
>
> -j.
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Martijn Kruiten <mart...@kruiten.nl>
> wrote:
> > Correction: it obviously varies with ISO /and/ some other variables.
> >
> > Op zo 15 mei 2016 om 17:10 schreef Martijn Kruiten <mart...@kruiten.nl>:
> >>
> >> Your blackpoint was not the same as the value that was reported in the
> >> Google Groups issue. I changed it to be the same and that fixed it, so
> >> that's definitely where the issue is
> >> (
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/d3h5uwwoj7xe4w7/DSCF3831-Darktable_blackpointfix.png?dl=0
> ).
> >>
> >> Quote from the group:
> >>
> >> "Camconst.json cannot help with BL because it is not steady in every ISO
> >> but varies depending on other settings (exposure time should be one),
> >> sensors temperature etc.
> >>
> >> I converted the samples provided (see forum link) to DNG and there one
> can
> >> see that while the first 3200ISO sample (DSC3831) has BL
> 253-258-258-253 the
> >> other two samples at 3200ISO have BL 251-260-260-251, 251-263-263-250
> >> (channel order is R-G1-G2-B) .."
> >>
> >> So the blackpoint varies with ISO and maybe some other variables and
> >> should be read out for each image independently.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Martijn
> >>
> >> Op zo 15 mei 2016 om 16:43 schreef johannes hanika <hana...@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>> well, we're not using dcraw and the black point (as you can see in the
> >>> screenshot) is the same as the one in the google groups issue you
> >>> posted after the fix. possibly the black point is a red herring here.
> >>>
> >>> j.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Martijn Kruiten <mart...@kruiten.nl>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Hi Johannes,
> >>> >
> >>> > I only pushed a few stops to exaggerate it. I'm seeing green shadows
> >>> > even in
> >>> > well lit daylight ISO 1600 shots without exposure compensation, but i
> >>> > felt
> >>> > this image could demonstrate it much better. Also, in your screenshot
> >>> > the
> >>> > shadows are still green, just less obvious because they are darker.
> >>> > They are
> >>> > not green in Adobe Camera Raw, DxO and Aperture and they aren't in
> >>> > RawTherapee either, all at default settings, white balance as shot,
> >>> > exposure
> >>> > compensation set at any value, camera profile set to any profile. I
> >>> > added a
> >>> > Camera Raw sample to the Dropbox folder as an additional sample. If
> >>> > it's
> >>> > just a limitation of the way Darktable processes these images, so be
> >>> > it, but
> >>> > to me it seems very much like the issue RawTherapee had in 2013.
> Sadly
> >>> > I do
> >>> > not have a sample of the old RawTherapee picture anymore. I'll check
> if
> >>> > I
> >>> > can download an older version. It was just as bad as it is in
> Darktable
> >>> > now.
> >>> > There is another (closed source) raw editor with this issue, but I
> >>> > don't
> >>> > remember which one it was.
> >>> >
> >>> > Also, I'll try to set the blackpoint myself. I didn't realize there
> is
> >>> > a gui
> >>> > option for that. I'll report back. Hopefully it's indeed consistent
> >>> > across
> >>> > images, although I could not find the correct blackpoint in the gui
> of
> >>> > RawTherapee before they patched DCRaw.
> >>> >
> >>> > Regards,
> >>> >
> >>> > Martijn
> >>> >
> >>> > Op zo 15 mei 2016 om 14:51 schreef johannes hanika <
> hana...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> hey,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> i believe our black point is correct (see screenshot below [0]).
> >>> >>
> >>> >> it's just a bit much to ask to push a 3200 ISO image by 3 stops and
> >>> >> get useful colour rendition out of the box. the rawtherapee shot
> looks
> >>> >> like a different whitebalance/colour profile/curve has been applied?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> anyways, you're always free to change the black point for such noisy
> >>> >> shots in emergency cases. maybe if that is consistently the case for
> >>> >> all images, we should include a high-iso black level into the
> rawspeed
> >>> >> cameras.xml?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> cheers,
> >>> >>  jo
> >>> >>
> >>> >> [0]
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> http://picpaste.com/pics/2016-05-16-004547_2560x1440_scrot-6zN1i4ho.1463316422.png
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Martijn Kruiten <
> mart...@kruiten.nl>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >> > Hi,
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > There seems to be an issue with the blackpoint for some Fujifilm
> >>> >> > cameras, or
> >>> >> > at least the X100 model. I'm not sure if you're using DCRaw as the
> >>> >> > decoder,
> >>> >> > but it had and may still have an issue that causes this, which has
> >>> >> > been
> >>> >> > patched by RawTherapee after I reported it back in 2013
> >>> >> > (https://code.google.com/archive/p/rawtherapee/issues/2049). What
> >>> >> > happens is
> >>> >> > that the darkest parts of the image have a green tinge because the
> >>> >> > blackpoint is read incorrectly from the raw file. This is
> >>> >> > unfortunate,
> >>> >> > because I really like working with Darktable. I exported a sample
> >>> >> > with
> >>> >> > the
> >>> >> > exposure
> >>> >> > correction set at +3 and exported the same image with default
> >>> >> > settings
> >>> >> > from
> >>> >> > RawTherapee to show what I'm talking about:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/m5wtb7rfyxv1e1r/AABQ6czz7p-l9qf0Sly8093wa?dl=0.
> >>> >> > The raw is also included. If I can help in any way, please let me
> >>> >> > know.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Regards,
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Martijn Kruiten
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> >>> >> > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
> >>> >> > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>

___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Reply via email to