On 6 May 2016 at 09:56, Roman Lebedev <lebedev...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Graeme Leese <gnl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > on the HEAD from git >> > I love it when people mis-apply non-git terminology to git :) > I guess you meant git master? >
I think I was misapplying git terminology to git, but yes, I meant git master. in the last few days (I'm afraid that workspace is on a different machine >> so I don't have the commit sha to hand). I was also using the version of >> lensfun from Pascal's darktable-unstable PPA -- I'm not sure if the last >> released version has multiple profiles for this lens. >> > Hm, i did not look into that yet, but i would have thought > that https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/pull/1059 fixed just > that... > Possibly, although I'm not sure that quite addresses this case. Following Torsten's commit darktable now gets a list of 3 lenses that match the exif in the raw file and it makes a menu of the three in the correction module GUI. When I make a selection from the menu it copies the name into the module parameters, but all the lenses have the same name, "Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 Mk ii" (or similar). When the parameters are committed another lookup is done using the name, which I would expect to return the same list of lenses. The first element of this list is always taken, so the selection from the menu isn't effective. Thanks, Graeme ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
