On 8 January 2017 at 18:23, Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> wrote: > On 8 January 2017 at 16:42, Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> wrote: >> On 8 January 2017 at 11:06, Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> wrote: >>> On 8 January 2017 at 09:08, Elronnd via D.gnu <d.gnu@puremagic.com> wrote: >>>> On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 15:10:36 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 28 December 2016 at 07:51, Elronnd via D.gnu <d.gnu@puremagic.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> *snip* >>>>> It seems the bug is also in dmd too? Unless it is fixed in master/latest >>>>> release, in which case will need to find out when this happened. >>>> >>>> >>>> It works fine for me on dmd. >>> >>> Then the version of dmd I have probably isn't new enough then. If the >>> latest is fine, then the C++ mangler just needs to be sync'd between >>> the two codebases. It's totally encapsulated, so is relatively >>> straightforward, once you get over the D -> C++ conversion. ;-) >> >> Looks like this is the related bug in DMD: >> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15372 > > Actually, no. It's this bug that is related indirectly, as the C++ > mangler sees a Tuple parameter '[int]', but with the patch applied, it > flattens all tuples so we are just left with the Type 'int'. > > https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7469
But of course there's a bug in the patch! https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15789
