On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:44:20 +0000 "Ledd via D.gnu" <d.gnu@puremagic.com> wrote:
> My point being that for the majority of people, the ones that > work on open source projects, large projects, productions for the > masses, a stable language and a predictable release cycle, is > more valuable then a cutting-edge feature-reach language . so they can take a stable language with predictable release cycle and so on. C, for example. D must change faster, not slower. i can't see why i should lose features which makes D valuable for me to please imaginary future adopters.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
