On 4 April 2014 14:42, Artur Skawina <art.08...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/04/14 15:14, Johannes Pfau wrote: >> Am Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:52:13 +0200 >> schrieb Artur Skawina <art.08...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Built latest gcc4-8-based gdc (fdf0c614) today; immediately ran into >>> this: >>> >>> Which is much more reasonable, and shouldn't require such hacks. >>> I thought that inlining /templated/ functions across modules already >>> worked; is this a different problem, and, more importantly, is it >>> fixable? > >> Please try to reduce such examples in the future ;-) > > Sorry. Yes, I should have tried harder. > > [I'm probably subconsciously avoiding going near any phobos code... :)] > > >> http://goo.gl/SJ0iEq >> http://goo.gl/ykumCI >> >> @property bool empty(T)(in T[] a) @safe pure nothrow >> >> it's the 'in' which causes inlining to fail (const also fails). > > Hmm, I remember const-args were a problem in the past, but I had > thought this was already fixed. A quick search reveals: > > http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37 (-ENOPERM)
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37 I should figure out what to do with /bugzilla. Maybe just put in a rewrite rule.
