http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57
Johannes Pfau <johannesp...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #5 from Johannes Pfau <johannesp...@gmail.com> 2013-05-29 17:26:17
UTC ---
Nice work!
But I can still reproduce this with the posted test case (GCC 4.8.0) if I
compile without optimization. With -O2 or higher it works fine.
Now the struct is initialized correctly in funcA:
movq $0x0,(%rax)
movq $0x0,0x8(%rax)
movl $0x4,-0x18(%rbp)
movq $0x2a,-0x10(%rbp)
And returned:
mov -0x18(%rbp),%rax
mov -0x10(%rbp),%rdx
But in the main function:
mov %eax,%ecx
mov %rdx,%rax
mov %ecx,-0x30(%rbp) <--- uses only 4 bytes of rax
//-0x2C(%rbp) is not initialized
mov %rax,-0x28(%rbp)
BTW: Do we also have to add the fillHoles code to StructInitializer::toDt?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
