John Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Despite the long-lived argument that public review of crypto assures
> its reliability, no national infosec agency -- in any country worldwide --
> follows that practice for the most secure systems. NSA's support for 
> AES notwithstanding, the agency does not disclose its military and
> high level systems.

Nevertheless, given that the public has two options (disclosure or
non-), it seems public review is as good as it gets.

You're right, of course---don't put 100% trust in anything---but I
think it's still reasonable to trust a publicly reviewed system more
than a closed one.

-- 
Riad Wahby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIT VI-2 M.Eng

Reply via email to