May be the information provided by the informant was wrong and it ended up that a 14 year kid along with 3 iraqi adults got killed and in order to prevent further outrage among iraqi's,the white house decided on playing its cards to its advantage.They didn't confirm their DNA test as yet-funny.
Regards Sarath. --- Dave Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eric Cordian wrote: > > Now that the new standard for pre-emptive war is > to murder the > > legitimate leader of another sovereign nation and > his entire family, > > an "artist's rendering" of Shrub reaping what he > sows would surely be > > an excellent political statement. > I am not sure these two were murdered as saddam's > sons (although obviously > they were, and were no doubt given priority over > equally worthy targets) > but as authority figures in the former government. > That they were also (if > they could be captured) bloody useful hostages > against actions by their > father probably didn't go without notice either. > However, if strafeing an occupied house with > helecopter gunships, rocket > launchers and heavy machine guns after a cursory > "surrender or die" is > ignored, based on military intel (which as the WMD > fiasco shows is > worthless if the PR spin department are demanding > raw access to unfiltered > intel and filtering, not on reliability but on > closeness of match to the > desired outcome) is to be the new standard, I > suspect a suicide bombing of > the white house (killing all the staff and the > shrub) would now be "ok" > provided they shouted 'surrender or die' first, yes? > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
